• Advertisement
Welcome! If you can see a big advert here, you're not logged in. Log in, or if you're not registered, register, and then log in, and the big ol' advert will disappear. (Subject to admin getting the settings right)

US Scat Mags

Where the lost, lonely and mentally ill can now be found chatting about MISERABLE motor vehicles. No O/T posts.

US Scat Mags

Postby Hirst » Sun May 13, 2012 9:52 pm

Restored from the old forum.

Having quite a lot of old car magazines (old as in the magazine itself), I thought it'd be nice to have a look at a few of them. Rather than a great big scan-a-thon of every page - which might be considered unfair by the writers - a look at some selection of interesting bits within, plus a bit of commentary and context. Moto-Scat is all about CONTENT, isn't it?

Motor Trend: June 1973

Image


At this time, America was suffering under the worldwide stock market crash of 1973-74. Whilst the oil crisis and recession were still months away, the economy was nonetheless suffering. As a result, the relatively new breed of small-engined subcompact cars were gaining popularity - notably the Chevrolet Vega, Ford Pinto and AMC Gremlin. In addition, budget-market imports skyrocketed - European and Japanese imports were commonplace for thrifty drivers, though the antiquated Beetle was now starting to falter against more modern designs such as the Datsun 510 and Toyota Corolla, with their advertising subsequently changing tack from cheap car to cool lifestyle choice.

The US motor industry also became the subject of increased safety regulation - September 1972 saw the introduction of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 215 - the rule that cars shouldn't sustain damage to "safety-related components" under an impact to front (5mph) or rear (2mph). Subsequently, 1973 model year cars sported enormous bumpers - particularly noticable on smaller cars.

In addition, the 1970 amendments to the Clean Air Act imposed increasingly tough standards on vehicles - targets of reducing carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons by 90% by the 1975 model year (based on 1970 models) and the same of nitrogen oxide by the 1976 model year (based on 1971 models). High-compression muscle car engines, which generally used 100RON fuel, suffered as fuel octane ratings dropped to 91RON, largely due to the loss of tetraethyl lead and subsequent the phase-in of unleaded. As a result, new muscle cars were low-compression, strangled by emissions devices and often became little more than a "sticker package" version of an ordinary model.

However, for the consumer, times were good. A much wider variety of cars existed than before. Domestic manufacturers were forced to compete with imports - usually well-equipped and cheap - in turn improving their own ranges for the benefit of price-conscious consumers. And whilst environmental rules killed the muscle car, luxury barges still had a fair old future ahead of them.

The opening article to this issue sums up quite well the view of motoring journalists of the time, so I've reproduced it here. As you can see, there's mixed feelings, but quite a lot to be happy about - gives a good taste of what's ahead.

---
Image
"These are far-reaching changes, but in the long run they signal another benchmark in Motor Trend's unparalleled growth as the most influencial mass-consumer automotive magazine of our time. As we see it, the '70s will be as distinct from the '60s as the '30s were from the 20's - a time of paring away affluences we really can't afford." It seemed like a good thing to say two years ago this month. It still is.

Then, June of 1971, the event was the announcement of the merging of Sports Car Graphic magazine into Motor Trend and the promise to bring you an automotive magazine whose purview knew no national boundaries. Now it's June, 1973, and the occasion is the announcement with this issue that we are adding a whopping 15, count 'em 15, additional regular features to our crammed informational package. Which is mind boggling, when you consider Motor Trend is already established as bridging the information gap with news about more phases of the automobile and the things that affect it, than anyone before has ever assembled.

Never before have Americans been so interested in the autmobile, its performance, economics, manufacture and general industry. But, it is not the traditional American bigger, better, drag-strip acceleration and boulevard-ride type of interest. Little by little, partly in response to governmental requirements but mostly competition and changing customer values, auto manufacturers in general seem to be pointing toward what may be a true product renaissance.

Hints of what's ahead can be seen everywhere. Small cars. Larger cars. Small cars with large prices. Foreign cars with American-Like options and American cars with Foreign-Like handling. A flourishing 10-million U.S. car market (30 million worldwide) where both super economy cars and super luxury cars do well.
Proliferating powerplants. Rotaries, Turbines, Steam. Steam? Yes, steam. Exhaust gas recirculation. Catalytic convertor mufflers. CVCC (controlled volume cylinder combustion). Gas rationing. Buyers Protection Plans. Front-wheel-drive. Four-wheel-drive. Front engine. Mid-engine. Five-mile-per-hour bumpers. Air bags. Hatchbacks, Fastbacks, Kammbacks. Camper backs. Rack-and-pinion steering. Radial tires. Bias-belted tires. Everywhere there is revolution and the promise of better things ahead.

Simultaneously, caught up in the spirit of the times, more than ever before, carmarkers are genuinely trying to improve not only the quality of their products but the service to keep them going. Service is probably the industry's single biggest problem and although it was created by a myopic kind of all-the-traffic-will-bearism in the '60s, you will see tremendous improvements soon. For instance, the fact that General Motors would study in detail Volkswagen's computer diagnostic service approach indicates, as well as anything, Detroit willingness to use good ideas.

Consequently, in relation to all of this, the role of the automotive magazines in the middle. '70s is different as well. For a time, perhaps a decade ago, it was enough, even fashionable, to be critical of everything Establishment. The home industry especially was an obvious, defensive, easy and deserving target. Most companies seemed about as vulnerable as the Maginot line as they tried to reorient themselves from a violent case of market vertigo where nothing they did or made seemed relevant. Time and time again they took opportunities for greatness and converted them into public debacles.

But the pendulum has swung back. The industry has headed off their critics and in some cases, proved their critics were at least partly wrong. They are going to meet the 1975 and '76 emissions standards. They are producing safer cars. And, they have demonstrated great imagination and resourcefulness responding to the challenge, and in the process, created the most interesting saleable products in their history. What is desperately needed now are sources of reliable information to sort through the veritable maze of product fallout. That's what Motor Trend is about.

Two years ago when the impact of the consumerism movement was only vaguely apprehended, we declared that objective, toward a broader subject base and more kinds of information. The features we showcase in this June issue and every issue hereafter will help us do just that.

---

So, interesting times to come! Whilst steam cars never really made the cut, practically everything else did - a surprisingly accurate portrayal of the future.

Here's a couple of bonus adverts to get you into 1973-mode (Barrett can skip these as he's already there).

Image
The Scent of Hirst.

Image

Another plus is that you can go mental and execute people like that mad kid in Earthquake.

I'll leave you to digest that for a bit before coming back with some more from the same issue - comments welcome.
User avatar
Hirst
IAN McGASKILL
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:24 am

Re: US Scat Mags

Postby Hirst » Sun May 13, 2012 9:57 pm

r.welfare wrote:I look forward to further installments, Dan_Hirst, as I am quite a fan of 70s motomags.

What interests me is that, even more so than Autocar or Motor (ignoring CAR at this point) of the time, they always seem to find something positive to say about a Yankee barge with nearly no redeeming features, qv. AMC Gremlin. And the ads, as you note, are top notch.

Also, is it me, or does Eric Dahlquist resemble Norman Tuttle from Streethawk?


garycox wrote:A geat read, Hirst, thanks for taking the time to write it up!

Looking forward to more installments!


Leonard Hatred wrote:Superb content, D. HURST OLDS.

Looking forward to reading about what happened with the '74 Mustang.


Funny you mention that Mustang II article, Len - I fancied doing it. I've defended the Ford Mustang II on other forums - people tend to ignore the whole picture with the Mustang, so let me give the way I see it - the extended version for Moto-Scat people.

If someone says the "original" Mustang, there's a fair old chance they're on about this:
Image

The 1964½ model, beloved and iconic - also, it has to be said, quite crude and dated from a design point of view. Bear in mind that one of the main reasons for the success of the Mustang was that it was an interesting and handsome car, but at a very low price. For instance, anything below a GT was drum brakes all round - whilst a small car by American standards, bear in mind the weight (1100kg) is around the same as a Sierra. Not that it wasn't a good car, it was a great car - but it was usually pretty basic.

Now, bear in mind that there were four generations of the original Mustang, which gradually grew in size as people demanded bigger engines (with the muscle car boom), more features, more luxury, etc. The final 1971-73 model looked like this:
Image

In just a few short years, the Mustang had gone from 1100kg to 1600kg. Not to mention, the high performance versions were hit in the same way all muscle cars were - it lost power with each year as the motors were detuned to fit in with the regulations, not to mention that the biggest engine size (429cu, 7.0L) disappeared completely.

Obviously, Ford couldn't carry on this way - if the car was to remain so big and heavy, it would become gradually more crippled as time went on. Drastic measures were needed, hence the Mustang II. The weight went back down from 1600kg to a bit under 1300kg, the length and wheelbase reduced, V8s were dropped completely (for the time being).

Now a point that many people miss when discussing the Mustang is that a lot of the buyers had already moved on - whilst the muscle car crowd were happy with the cars becoming bigger and heavier, people seeking a true Pony car had few options left - by the time of the Mustang II, the AMC Javelin was about the only thing close to the original concept (and subsequently carved out a niche for itself). Therefore, many buyers moved onto the closest available alternative - lightweight imports (Ford Capri, Datsun 240Z, Toyota Celica, MGB, Triumph Spitfire) and subcompacts (Ford Pinto, Chevrolet Vega, AMC Gremlin).

The Mustang II was aimed more towards these buyers - as the muscle car boom was pretty much over, the Mustang II made a hell of a lot of sense. They weren't particularly fast - the four-cylinder version was a bit of a joke - but they were good enough. In addition, they did have good handling for the time, rack-and-pinion steering, much-improved comfort, better build quality and chassis. I think they look pretty cool as well - more coherent than the last of the generation they replaced.

Ultimately, the Mustang II is one of those cars where car magazines look back on it with a "what were we thinking?" attitude, without looking at the context or trying to justify it alongside the bigger picture. In the mid 70s, it was the right car at the right time - it sold very well and people liked it. Nowadays, you can't even discuss it without some Mustang nerd whinging about how it was a travesty. What were Ford to do - keep making them as they did? Even if they could find a way around the Clean Air Act, the oil crisis would have reduced prospective buyers to an absolutely tiny segment of the market - presumably they wanted them to remain affordable also? Superb business model!

Anyway, that's enough of my thoughts on the Mustang II - let's hear from someone with a brain for a bit (no name provided, sadly).

---
Image

Image

When the first Ford Mustang debuted almost a decade ago, the car was such a radical departure from anything else on the road that it earned its master, Ford's Lee Iacocca, the cover of Time Magazine. Life magazine were so impressed with the world's first "ponycar" that it put out a full-color spread, heralding it as "a true sports car."

Dan Gurney drove a prototype and announced in another magazine, "This car will run the rubber off a Triumph or an MG. It has the feel of a 2-plus-2 Ferrari." If Dazzling Dan was impressed, he had good reason. The new Mustang he blasted around the track came with a 289-cubic-inch, 271-horsepower V-8 with four on the floor. It had a 108-inch wheelbase and overall was only 181.6 inches long. Zero-to-60 was accomplished in 7.1 seconds. And the basic model sold for an unheard-of $2368 (FOB Detroit), putting it in the price range of austere economy cars.

And it sold like hula hoops, Iococca was right: the World War II babies had come of car-buying age and Mustang was what they wanted - smaller, sportier cars with both performance and luxury. These other guys in Detroit picked up the ponycar baton and pretty soon it was a crowded, quick-changing market. The showplace became even more cluttered - and competitive - with the advent of the mini-ponycar, the subcompact, like Pinto and Maverick.

And here we are, 10 years after the brash Mustang arrived on the scene. We'll reserve our opinions on the new car's performance until we get hold of one. But briefly, here are the essentials of the new '74 Mustang:

- Ford obviously is attempting to return to the original small-size concept from which it probably should have strayed. In fact, the new Mustang's overall length is shorter than the original.

- The horsepower, due to many obvious factors, like emissions and insurance, is no longer emphasized. While the big '64 Mustang V8 boasted 210 horses (271 in high performance form) the '74 will come with a top of 110. Today, "big" translates to a 2.8-liter V-6, an uprated version of the 2.6-liter engine sold in the Capri. The basic engine will be a 2.3-liter overhead cam four-cylinder, producing 90 horses.

- Performancewise, the V-6 may compare closely with the Datsun 240Z. Ford ran through a series of 10-second speed tests. The new Mustang travelled 500 feet in that time, compared with 478 feet for the sporty Toyota Celica and 540 feet for the 240Z. (Ford expects the base engine to perform well because the emissions equipment is built in and not added on.)

- There will be five models to choose from: three fastbacks and two "notchbacks." One notchback will be the base model, the other called a "Grande" model. The three fastbacks will have a third door in the rear. One will be a two-seater, the other a Mach I performance model and the third a standard four-passenger fastback.

- Sizewise, as we said, the new Mustang is smaller than the original. It has a 96-inch wheelbase (13 inches shorter than '73) and 175 inches overall (19 inches shorter than the '73). While it is smaller than the original, the interior front seating is said to be more comfortable. And that, obviously, is because less room is required for the engine compartment with the smaller engines.

- Ford people have told us that contrary to popular belief, this shorter car has a smoother ride than the longer model. The secret, they say, is the new sub frame and suspension geometry up front. And there are those who say there is a lot of Pinto, Maverick and even Thunderbird design included in the new Mustang. We'll let you be the judge.

---

So that's that, for now - hope my ill-informed opinions were at least faintly distracting as there'll be more to come. Nice to be on a forum where you can discuss American cars without them instantly being denounced as rubbish or only good if they're a V8, etc.

Also, that guy does look a bit like Tuttle if you squint and imagine him doing that finger-waving thing off the intro.
User avatar
Hirst
IAN McGASKILL
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:24 am

Advertisement

Re: US Scat Mags

Postby Hirst » Sun May 13, 2012 10:01 pm

Barrett wrote:Interesting points there Re: The Mustang II.
One thing I'll add. I think the reason so many people disparage the M II (in terms of looks at least) is the total lack of stylistic continuity between the previous generation of Mustang. There really is nothing to tie the two cars together, and although looking at the 1964½ and the '73 they seem barely related, the look of those late cars had evolved continuously over time, which is a practice American car buyers had become accustomed to; Instead the designers did something that now seems quite bizarre, and tried desperately to make the new Mustang II evoke the original 1964½ cars! It's easiest to see in the notchback cars with the sculptured moldings ahead of the rear wheels and upward kink of the quarter windows supposedly conjuring up images of the original cars dummy vents and coke-bottle. Obviously this was supposed to tie in with the 'reinvention' of the Mustang along with the return to its old values instead of the 'bloated gas-guzzler' it had become, but however you shape it, someone thought it was a good idea to use styling queues that were 8 years out of date...

The people today who pour so much scorn on the M II are, like you say, not particularly well informed, but I think what they are actually reacting to is not the car itself but what it represents; A paradigm in American Car manufacture, the move away from the 'bigger is better' mentality that had been around since the 1930s and towards the thrifty purse-tightening that continues today. The fact that there is such an obvious stylistic break between this and the previous cars makes it an easy target to pick out as the exact moment that 'something changed'. I guess cars are so emblematic of America as a whole that what this, and the other similarly 'laughable' cars of that era, represent is the end of the golden age of American life for most people. It's the same sort of misplaced nostalgia that keeps people believing that an MGB is the 'best sportscar ever' and will, presumably, gradually disappear as younger people take over the 'scene' from the traditionalists that 'run' it now.


r.welfare wrote:As I see it, Lee Iacocca showed commendable precedence in downsizing the Mustang II. It sold like hot cakes in the first couple of model years due to the fuel crisis - but IIRC sales dropped off substantially in '76-'78 when gas became more plentiful again. Also a factor was that the in-house competition provided by the Capri Mk1/Mk2 dropped away as that car became less and less price-competitive due to the swing of the Deutschemark against the dollar.

It could really be seen as the first 'downsized' model, released far in advance of anything done by GM in '77/'78/'79 - and of course, they won massive plaudits with the B-body Caprice et al, for which the principles were not that different to the Mustang - base the new car off an existing, smaller model (Pinto for the 'Stang; A-body intermediates for the big Chevs). The devil was, however, in the details.

Iacocca was no stranger to a love of 'formal styling cues' - witness how traditional the K-cars looked (albeit they were slightly more aerodynamic than they appeared). And his desire to retain wire wheel covers, vinyl roofs and hood ornaments all the way through the early 90's...


Barrett - I agree that the styling seems a slightly strange mixture of old and new - the old-style front combined with a 70s coke-bottle body in particular. I guess the Mustang II is a fairly easy target for people, though I think Ford made the right decision (their sales figures and generally positive reviews of the time attest to that). Any true muscle cars still kicking around that point were really on borrowed time - old models were only worth continuing until they became too strangled by emissions/safety, so it would have been ill-advised to create a whole new model using the same old "heavy body/powerful" engine formula. I also think that a lot of the negativity has to do with how car enthusiasts tend to think - they usually look towards the "best" trim specs rather than the car as a whole. Whilst the minority of muscle car fanatics would have been at a complete loss with the Mustang II - even the later V8 ones were a shadow of their former self - I expect that the average punter who went for low/middling specifications would have appreciated the improvements.

Welf - certainly was ahead of its time in terms of a downsized body, those generally being strong-armed by the Corporate Average Fuel Economy regulations of 1975. They certainly lost out towards the end of the model though, as you say. Since it wasn't even tooled up for a V8 from the start, they must have been fairly sure it was the end for cars like that. I guess the mistake was not responding quickly enough to the changing market conditions. Having said that about the formal styling cues, it has to be said that the buying public are absolutely terrified of change - but it must have looked a bit odd when you saw a fully stickered-up King Cobra parked next to a chintzy Ghia with whitewalls/hubcaps/vinyl roof. I suppose you have to strike a balance, though they certainly leaned towards the older market more than the original - I bet the average buyer was a good 10 years older.

Here's a couple more ads to keep things going before the next proper article - this time, car ones.

Image
The Austin Marina was obviously the American-spec of our Morris, introduced in 1973. Only the 2-door Coupe and 4-door "Sedan" were available, with the 1.8 B-Series. Despite trying to sell it off the back of the MGB (as pictured), it was a sales failure - few were sold and buyers complained of poor build quality and gearboxes packing up. In addition, the car was sold at an extremely low price, so much that the government took British Leyland to court, accusing them of selling them at below cost to the US market. The case was dropped due to poor evidence, though the allegations were near-definitely true. In any case, Marina imports ended in 1975. In terms of rarity, I've only ever seen a single one (background car, old episode of CHiPs).

Image
The 1970s saw an increase in cars being fitted with aftermarket parts, leading some manufacturers to themselves offer extensive - usually visual - personalisation options from the factory, which was a quick way of adding extra profit. This Pinto here would have netted a tidy sum.

Here is a clickable big version so you can really have a look at what you're getting. Incidentally, the "Hot Pants Kit" consists of the fibreglass additions and the "Accent Group" is some of the brightwork, hubcaps and colour-coded carpet. More Pinto info in this great Buyer's Digest from fordpinto.com
User avatar
Hirst
IAN McGASKILL
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:24 am

Advertisement

Re: US Scat Mags

Postby Hirst » Sun May 13, 2012 10:08 pm

garycox wrote:That chin spoiler thing on the pinto looks rubbish!

I don't think I was aware of the Austin Marina before, there are a few more on IMCDB: http://www.imcdb.org/vehicles.php?make= ... del=marina


Barrett wrote:Excellent, I didn't realise the Marina was sold as an Austin in the US, hence me calling the one in First Blood a Morris when I added it to IMCDB...
Image


I guess I just thought it was some mental guy's import, I had no idea they were even sold there. The whole idea sounds faintly ridiculous, especially with the court case


r.welfare wrote:
Hirst wrote:Having said that about the formal styling cues, it has to be said that the buying public are absolutely terrified of change - but it must have looked a bit odd when you saw a fully stickered-up King Cobra parked next to a chintzy Ghia with whitewalls/hubcaps/vinyl roof. I suppose you have to strike a balance, though they certainly leaned towards the older market more than the original - I bet the average buyer was a good 10 years older.

Aye, but the Taurus was an absolute home run hit in '86, even though Ford hedged their bets for the conservative South and kept the LTD/Marquis (nee Fairmont - aka the car that Taggart and Rosewood use to tail Axel Foley in Beverley Hills Cop) in production for another year. After three months they realised their mistake and put the second factory onto Taurus production.

That reminds me, I've recently ordered the book about Taurus by Eric Taub that I will read after the Bollox-recommendation 'Ford' by Robert Lacey that was delivered yesterday!


Hirst wrote:Yes, the "banana-in-the-tailpipe" special!

I'd like to know more about the Taurus, glad that there's a book about for it.


Spottedlaurel wrote:I've got a good stash of 'proper' road tests out in the shed, but I like stumbling across these rather polite articles in regional magazines. In a bid to keep the advertisers happy, and no doubt ensure the Motoring Correspondent was suitably favoured/rewarded, they're usually unstintingly flattering. I've been buying odd copies as and when I find them, but recently I scored a pile of them at the local auctions. Here are a few:

Image
Ford Corsair 2000E road test 1967 by Spottedlaurel, on Flickr

Exhilerating!

Image
Datsun 1600 (510) test East Anglian Magazine 5/69 by Spottedlaurel, on Flickr

First drive of a Japanese car.

Image
1968 Vauxhall Viva SL (HB) road test by Spottedlaurel, on Flickr

Went like a rocket. Really?...

Image
1964 Austin 1100 road test - Botwoods, Ipswich by Spottedlaurel, on Flickr

Ideal for the woman driver.

Image
Austin 1800 article 1971 by Spottedlaurel, on Flickr

It is not a glamorous or 'exciting' car.

I have loads more. I rather like the local aspect of it all, I can picture (or have sometimes photographed) the garages that lent the cars out and there's always a series of ad's from other local dealers. Even in a town the size of Ipswich there might be five or six garages selling a particular brand, it's handy to help me work out who sold what and when. There is no need or good reason for this of course...


Seth wrote:GR63 work on this thread Hirst. Its kind of what I would have liked to do with those mags but I think you've made a start much better than would have managed.

SL, nice bit about the Viva Romahome in that SL article.


Spottedlaurel wrote:
Seth wrote:SL, nice bit about the Viva Romahome in that SL article.

"There is a small gas stove with a collapsible seat on which your wife can sit when she is cooking..."

The dealer's in question - Watson & Smith in Diss - is no more in name, but Vauxhall are still being sold from the same building and I drive past it very regularly. Pleasing to think of stuff like that HB and Dormobiles coming and going there in years gone by.
User avatar
Hirst
IAN McGASKILL
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:24 am

Advertisement


Return to Bitter Men

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

cron